Neither parliament nor the president changed course
The government, political parties, Pakistan Bar Council, Supreme Court Bar, and Attorney General received notices from the Supreme Court during the hearing of petitions challenging the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Bill. The Chief Justice announced that the decree would be published in due course, along with the possible appointment of judicial assistants.
The case against the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Bill is being heard by an 8-member bigger bench, which is presided over by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umar Ata Bandial.
Justices Ijazul Hassan, Muneeb Akhtar, Mazahir Naqvi, Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Ayesha Malik, Hasan Azhar Rizvi, and Shahid Waheed make up the remaining members of the bench.
Citizens Chaudhry Ghulam Hussain and Raja Amir Khan contested the proposed law that the Parliament passed in the Supreme Court.
The Pakistan Bar Council, Supreme Court Bar, Attorney General, and political parties have all received notices from the Supreme Court about the Judicial Reforms Bill.
The Chief Justice announced that the decree would be published in due course, along with the possible appointment of judicial assistants.
It is a significant case, according to Justice Umar Atta Bandial, in which the judiciary's independence was questioned.
Petitioner Raja Amir's lawyer Imtiaz Siddiqui opened the arguments. He said that this case is of great importance in the current situation, after the Qasim Suri case, there has been a lot of political division, since the restoration of the National Assembly, the political crisis has increased, the federal government and the Election Commission are willing to hold elections. No, the court had to take notice of itself for not conducting the elections.
Imtiaz Siddiqui says that the court ordered the election commission to hold elections, on April 3 the court ordered to hold elections again, and more problems were created after the court order to follow the constitution and personal criticism of the court and judges. Done, government ministers and MPs are responsible for it.
The petitioner's lawyer said that the independence of the judiciary was interfered with by the proposed legislation, the bill was sent to the President after the approval of both houses, but the President raised objections and sent the bill back to the Assembly, the objections of the President due to political differences. has not been reviewed, the bill will become law in 10 days after approval by the joint session, under Article 191 the Supreme Court makes its own rules, under the bill automatic notices and formation of benches will be done by a 3-member committee, the main question Is this bill worthy to become a law?
0 Comments